Read for evidence
A school nature club studied a nearby wetland. Members recorded birds from a public path and noted the plants growing at the water’s edge. They discovered that the wetland provided food, shelter and space for water after heavy rain. A local conservation worker explained that litter removal alone would not protect every species. Water quality and connected habitats mattered too. The pupils prepared a summary that distinguished their own observations from the worker’s explanation. They did not enter nesting areas or claim that a single visit proved a population was increasing. Their report proposed regular observation and less plastic waste at the nearby market. Protecting an ecosystem required both careful evidence and practical cooperation.
First identify the central activity. Underline actions and reasons separately; an action tells what happened, a reason tells why. A negative detail can help you reject an attractive but inaccurate option.